简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:CFTC imposes $150,000 penalty on UK trader Adam Cobb-Webb for illegal spoofing in NYMEX WTI Futures contracts, highlighting commitment to market integrity.
Today, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) made a significant move in ensuring the integrity of financial markets. The CFTC issued an order against UK-based trader, Adam Cobb-Webb, filing and settling charges for his involvement in several instances of spoofing in West Texas Intermediate (WTI) light sweet crude oil futures contracts. These contracts were traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. (NYMEX) between approximately December 16, 2021, and January 14, 2022.
Spoofing, an illegal practice involving the placing and then canceling of orders with no intention of executing them, has been at the center of this case. According to the order, Cobb-Webb regularly employed a manipulative trading pattern that involved placing an iceberg order (an order whose total quantity is partially visible) on one side of the order book to be executed. At the same time, he would place a series of fully-visible orders (spoof orders) on the opposite side, at the initial price levels, with the sole intention of canceling them before execution.
After successfully executing the iceberg orders, Cobb-Webb would proceed to cancel the spoof orders. This pattern of trading occurred daily throughout the specified period. Notably, Cobb-Webb's spoof orders constituted a significant percentage of orders at the top price levels when placed. Furthermore, the quantity of these spoof orders was often several times larger than the visible quantity of his iceberg orders.
The order pointed out that Cobb-Webb entered the spoof orders intending to cancel them, with the goal of creating a misleading impression of buying or selling interest. This was done with the aim of inducing other market participants to cross the bid-ask spread and fill his iceberg orders. Cobb-Webb knew or recklessly disregarded the fact that these spoof orders would create a false image of market depth, thereby disseminating misleading information about supply and demand. This kind of misinformation can significantly influence market activity.
In the wake of these findings, the CFTC ordered Cobb-Webb to pay a hefty civil monetary penalty of $150,000. Additionally, the trader has been slapped with a one-year trading ban from all CFTC-designated exchanges, CFTC-registered entities, and all commodity interests. He is also required to desist from violating the spoofing prohibition outlined in the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA).
Ian McGinley, the Director of Enforcement at the CFTC, underscored the implications of this order. He noted, “This order is the latest in a long series of actions by the Commission to punish spoofing in the markets the Commission oversees. Spoofing is easier than ever for the Commission to identify and pursue. Our message to would-be spoofers is this: Dont.”
The CFTC extends its appreciation to the CME Group for its assistance in this case. It is worth noting that the staff of the Division of Enforcement who worked tirelessly on this action include Ashley J. Burden, Matthew Edelstein, Elizabeth N. Pendleton, Scott R. Williamson, and Robert T. Howell.
For those eager to stay informed on the latest market news and updates, it is recommended to download and install the WikiFX App on your smartphone. It provides real-time updates and valuable insights into the world of finance. Download the App here: https://www.wikifx.com/en/download.html.
In conclusion, this action taken by the CFTC serves as a stern warning to all market participants. The Commission remains dedicated to safeguarding the integrity of the financial markets and will not hesitate to enforce penalties on those found violating the rules. As such, all traders must adhere strictly to the rules to avoid facing similar repercussions.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
A revered broker name is what you want to associate with being a forex trader. Fortunately, you have plenty of such names on WikiFx where the best forex brokers and regulators are listed to ensure your transaction is genuine. One such name is FXCM, a regulated forex broker in the United Kingdom (UK). Let’s check out more details about FXCM through this article.
A fake video showing former Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng promoting an investment scheme has started spreading online. Lim has come forward to say the video is not real and was made using artificial intelligence (AI).
In an industry where safety and transparency are essential, the regulatory status of online brokers has never been more important. For traders seeking to protect their capital, ensuring that a platform operates under recognised and stringent oversight can make all the difference. Keep reading to learn more about IronFX and its licenses.
Mulling foreign exchange contract options - Spot vs Forward - to begin or consolidate your trading journey? Read this comprehensive guide explaining the differences between spot and forward contracts. You can select better using it.