简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:BaFin has flagged a growing list of online platforms operating without authorisation in Germany. Many are linked to unlicensed activity and misleading branding tactics.
Germanys financial regulator BaFin (Federal Financial Supervisory Authority) has recently issued a series of public warnings against a growing number of websites offering financial, investment, and cryptoasset services without proper authorisation. These platforms are not supervised by BaFin, and in several cases, are suspected of identity fraud or cloning legitimate institutions.
According to the regulator, any entity wishing to operate within Germanys financial markets must first obtain appropriate authorisation. However, BaFin has discovered that many companies continue to offer services illegally, posing a direct risk to consumers and investors.
In its latest warnings, BaFin has listed multiple suspicious domains. These include:
Several of the listed websites were found to use the names and branding of real financial institutions, a practice known as cloning. In such cases, fake entities mimic the look and feel of authorised companies, sometimes even copying legal disclaimers or offering nearly identical websites, which misleads consumers into thinking the service is legitimate.
BaFin has clarified that none of these platforms are licensed, and their activities are being actively investigated.
Investors in Germany are urged to exercise extreme caution when engaging with online financial platforms. Before depositing funds or providing personal information, users should verify:
To assist with due diligence, platforms like WikiFX provide comprehensive broker evaluations, including regulatory status, risk ratings, user reviews, and detection of unlicensed or cloned firms.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
NinjaTrader fined $250K by NFA for AML failures, missing suspicious trades and high-risk accounts. Learn about the brokerages compliance issues and regulatory history.
Despite its global presence, FXPRIMUS faces serious regulatory red flags and a flood of client complaints, earning it a troubling 2.46/10 rating on WikiFX. Keep reading to find out what is wrong with this broker!
A financial analyst from Kuala Terengganu has lost RM147,350 to a sophisticated investment scam. The fraud was run by a syndicate that posed as a legitimate stock trading platform. The victim believed he was making a smart financial move. Instead, he lost his savings, borrowed funds, and company money to a non-existent scheme.
Recent complaints logged by users of WikiFX, a global broker regulatory query platform, have brought IFC Markets into the spotlight for all the wrong reasons. Multiple traders have reported serious difficulties withdrawing their funds, raising red flags about the broker’s trustworthiness and operational integrity.